it was interesting to read theo’s response. my first thought was “wow… he was totally not inflammatory and incensed”.

anyway, he had some interesting points - some of which we (OpenSolaris) might want to keep in mind as we think about future licensing directions.

more interestingly he drew the conclusion that the BSD community was (is?) at as much risk of being locked out of future changes by the GPL community as they are from the commercial/proprietary community (if not more).

2 Responses to “theo’s response to the dual licensing gpl/bsd controversy”

  1. nacho Says:

    i found the answer of the GPL community to that mail much more insightfull. This really should get the supporters of dual licensing to think for a while

  2. Gentry Says:

    The GPL is kind of evil, I don’t much like it.

    Stallman is a serious nutjob, and that Theo ends up striking sober tones about this should speak volumes to the problem.

    I would far rather see people use most any other license than the GPLv2, much less v3.

Leave a Reply

Comments will be sent to the moderation queue.


Recent posts