and then there were none…
April 30th, 2006 Stephen Lau
first owen
and now rooney 
i don’t fancy our chances with our backup strikers. who are we gonna play? bent and crouch? bent and defoe? crouch and defoe? as much as i think crouch is ineffective, i think as a target man, he would play well with bent or defoe. bent and defoe are too alike to pair up well.
[tags: Football]
5 Comments Add your own
-
1.
ux-admin | April 30th, 2006 at 11:57
You do know that “And then there were none” is a title of one of the famous sociological literary works on nonviolent anarchy?
-
2.
Stephen Lau | April 30th, 2006 at 16:40
Yes… but I’m not sure what your point is.
-
3.
ux-admin | May 1st, 2006 at 08:27
My point is that your title is misleading. I clicked on the link thinking you were about to discuss some serious literature and raise an intelectual discussion… instead I landed straight into sports, oh my!
-
4.
I didn’t realise titles were exclusive to literary works
My intent was not to mislead… I just thought it was a catchy phrase, and one that applied (literally interpreted, of course) to the current condition of the England football team. -
5.
Darkjoker | May 2nd, 2006 at 13:42
maybe we can have our revenge now that rooney and owen are injured, we had a painfull experice 4 years ago, out in the first round when everyone had so much faith in the team…. jokes aside, too bad those two were injured, I think england has a great team with or without them and i am looking forward to seeing them in acction
Greetings from Argentina
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
