when a nightly that closes on a build date isn’t a build
Tuesday, Feb 28. 2006 – Category: OpenSolaris
previously, every delivery we made was of a build snapshot. now that we’ve moved to weekly snapshot deliveries, i’ve moved to calling them nightly (as in synchronised with the 2006-02-28 nightly), rather than build-synchronised deliveries.
however, it’s important to still keep build-synchronised deliveries for projects like Xen & BrandZ which need build-synchronised sources to patch against.
there’s one problem though.
if you look at the ONNV build schedule, we see that 2006-02-27 is the close date for build 35. So the delivery that I will make later today (2006-02-28) means it should be build 35, right? Not exactly.
Danek, our illustrious and overworked ON gatekeeper, is responsible for delivering onnv_35 (the ON sources for Solaris Nevada build 35) to the WOS (i.e.: Wad Of Stuff… all the consolidations that go to make Solaris Nevada build 35). If it turns out that the 2006-02-27 nightly has problems, Danek may back out putbacks, or pull in put putbacks that happened post-build-close-date before delivering it to the WOS.
So what does that mean for the OpenSolaris community? Well, I can continue to deliver on time weekly deliveries… but this means that my nightly deliveries that sync on a build-close-date may not necessarily be exactly what comprises that build (in terms of Solaris Express). OR, I can delay deliveries in order to match up exactly with ON’s builds.
Personally, I much prefer to do the first option. This means that the source code you see is exactly what we’re working on internally – with no one-week delay. And whatever bug you may or may not see that Danek would have folded back in to the build snapshot, will probably (hopefully?) be resolved by the following week’s delivery.
One Trackback to “when a nightly that closes on a build date isn’t a build”
3 Comments to “when a nightly that closes on a build date isn’t a build”
-
Danek Duvall Says:
February 28th, 2006 at 17:19Also, hopefully, the same snapshot that gets respun as necessary will also be available for view outside Sun. It’s usually pretty critical for project teams to sync up with the actual build, rather than just the initial snapshot, and that’s unlikely to be any different for external project teams.
-
Stephen Lau Says:
February 28th, 2006 at 17:22yup, it will be available as a separate build-synchronised delivery.
-
Juno888 Says:
June 3rd, 2007 at 17:35Thats good idea… it much better..
Leave a Reply
Recent posts
- remiss
(Thursday, Nov 8. 2012 – 1 Comment) - Gesture Lock
(Saturday, Nov 13. 2010 – 14 Comments) - ConnectIn 1.1.1 & HTC Sense UI
(Tuesday, Sep 28. 2010 – 38 Comments) - ConnectIn
(Saturday, Sep 25. 2010 – 62 Comments)
Categories
- Android
- Cars
- ChinaBlog
- Code
- Computers
- Development
- Food
- Football
- Grommit
- Linkage
- Movies&TV
- Music
- Musings
- OpenSolaris
- OpenSource
- Outdoors
- Pets
- Photos
- Quotage
- Rdio
- Songbird
- Sun
- Travel
Grommit
Mozilla
OpenSolaris
- alan burlison
- bonnie corwin
- eric boutilier
- glynn foster
- jim grisanzio
- mark nelson
- mike kupfer
- planet opensolaris
- stephen hahn
Songbird
Archives
- November 2012
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002

February 28th, 2006 at 17:14